Friday, March 1, 2013

Ben Reiss and Sleep


   It was very interesting talking to Benjamin Reiss in class on Thursday and later that evening. I was surprised to find that he did not receive any backlash from what he wrote about. I thought for sure someone from the medical community or even the minority groups that he was exposing would have something to say about his work. After describing how he went about his research and his writing it made more sense to me. Rather than rehashing the story and re-exploiting the people he was researching he paid special attention to how he told their story. The way he approaches his work, as a story teller and not a scientist allows for him to ask questions not typical of questions asked in articles about science. Reiss' approach gives the “freaks” a story out of the public eye.
   His talk Thursday night brought up more interesting points about race and sleep. He showed an image from the Civil War era that showed a white women in bed. He said that white people and slave masters often slept. This made me think about Gone with the Wind and how during the war Scarlet, the main character, is always being taken care of because she has slaves. After the war when she doesn't have any slaves she is still working to get back to Tara, her plantation. She increasingly becomes depressed throughout the film and must rest often. While the slaves earlier in the film were being worked to the bone they didn't have time to take bed rest. Sleep became a sign of affluence. If someone could sleep often it meant that they did not have to work; that they had slaves to do it. In class as we discussed how simple things in life like head shape gets medicalized, Reiss took it a step further and made us all think about how sleep can be used to control other people.  

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Response to Darren's post

I thought that Darren's post about Kate Middleton's pregnancy was very intriguing. Since her involvement with Prince William, she has always been a press favorite. The interesting thing about Kate is her rise into royalty or upper class. She as always been portrayed as the everyday girl who met the prince in college (as many couples do) and now will become the future queen of England. In a lot of cases the press portrayed their courtship as almost a modern love story. Her rise to stardom and ascension into upperclass begs the question of whether or not she should be viewed as a role model because of her status or because her "everyday-ness." Regardless, the press loves her either way. But Darren's post about her pregnancy does spark some concerns. Obviously, being hospitalized for morning sickness seems a bit unusual. The royal family would have the best access to hospitals and treatments because of their wealth and popular support. But this access is because she is apart of royal family now. If she was still the "every girl" she might not receive such treatment if she was a pregnant with non-royalty. It seems very paradoxical that the "every-girl" status is being portrayed through her high class, especially in the press. Because of their wealth and popularity, upper class has always had a fair amount of attention drawn to them. But Kate Middleton who seems to be a bit of both will always have the spotlight on her, and she isn't even the queen yet...

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

An Upper Class "Issue"


Kate Middleton is a contemporary example of a high class woman. Coincidentally, she is now pregnant with her first child and developed a case of morning sickness. The media took advantage of this opportunity for a story and exposed to the public, to the dismay of the Queen and their family. Kate Middleton obtained the morning sickness and was placed in a hospital for a few days. This has some resemblance to bed rest and how women were advised to stay in bed for the sickness. Would a middle class woman have had the opportunity to receive the same treatment? I believe that a middle class woman would not have been able to take off of work if she was working. Middleton, being upper class did not have to worry about work; she only had to cancel some commitments that she had made before.  Prince William was not with her the full time she was recovering. This Hollywood Life article shows a statement that shows a patriarchal society still in use, “[Kate] wants him to quit the military — she’s terrified he might get killed! But William is torn between his traditional duty to ‘Queen and country’ and his devotion to his wife.” William does not choose to comfort his wife while she is recovering, but chooses to keep working and provide for the country. Does this show any inequalities in the relationship? Why or why not?


Darren Pope

American Horror Story: Insane Asylum

For those who are familiar with American Horror Story, the first season took place in the haunted house. In this season it was showing how the male subject of authority is more dominant than the women's authority. However we transition into the next season, with different characters and a totally different setting. In the second season, instead of a house, it is taking place in an insane asylum. In this show however, there is a whole new transition in authority. It seems in this episode, the authority is switched between genders. For those who are not familiar with the show, there is this nun who is in charge of the asylum, and she has authority and power on all of the patients in the hospital.
This could also tie in with the sick people arguement. Of course all of the patients in the asylum are supposed to be insane. However in the show, we see the authority as being more insane than the patients, while the patients are in the asylum (some patients get out and the show gets crazy from there). I just thought that between the show there is an interesting transition between authority between both seasons.

-Courtney O'Donnell

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

From Hysteria to Hypochondria

As the readings present us with the class differences between the upper-middle class women and middle class women in the medical field I could not help myself to think about how the so called medical "conditions" of the past have evolved into our modern day society. When Hysteria is mentioned in our first readings about the sick upper class woman all I could really think about is how this still exists to this day in other forms and how it has become a non-gender bias situation. We as a society have gone the term Hysteria to Hypochondria. The way I have seen this and how society has seen this just in the past few decades has been because of outbreaks such as swine flu, bird flu, mad cow disease, etc. These outbreaks alone made our modern day society fearful and it did not help that the mass media was spending every day of each epidemic reminding us to watch out or we could be next. Now we live in a society where I would like to call it the "germ-x" society. We are constantly fighting these mysterious problems and risks to our health and while we are worrying about we eventually worry ourselves to a point when our immune system is affect. We believe that if our own personal space is clean 24/7 then we are safe from the invisible threats. When in fact we are so worried that the newest generations are potentially being put at risk the most. In todays society people are starting to beleive that vaccines are harmful to their children and therefore not getting them. When infact one of the first basic principles to being a parent is learning that sometimes your child needs to get sick in order to build a stronger immunity. But some of society is turning their backs on this ideas and we are starting to see the same problems in our medicalized society as seen in the days when they were out of control. This constant worrying about getting sick is unhealthy in its own way, yet some people believe in at least a germ free utopia we can live happier lives. I on the other hand look forward to getting my next cold as frustrating as it might be, I know it will make me that much stronger in the long run for my basic immunity. So in general I am saying that our society has taken a turn for the worst in worrying about health problems as much as they are trying to eliminate them. So I hope that within the next generation of people, the people of today will realize that having the flu can benefit you and help you when some actually serious might occur. However, if you think that if the world did not have such problem then please try an explain to me how having life threating chicken pox as an adult will be less problematic if you are placed in a health bubble for your entire childhood.

-William Webster

Artifact presentation: American Horror Story



Description and Analysis
            The artifact that I have chosen to discuss for my presentation is the miniseries “American Horror Story: Murder House”. The show centers on a husband, wife and their teenage daughter who move cross-country to live in a restored mansion, unaware that its former occupants haunt the home. The reason for uprooting their family is Ben, the husband, is caught cheating by his wife Vivian, who then suffers a miscarriage. This show aired from October 5th through December 21st, 2011. The show’s main storyline takes place present day, but the former inhabitant’s stories are told in flashback, all they way to 1922 when the house was built. The two clips I closely relate to today’s readings, “The “Sick” Women of the Upper Classes” and “The “Sickening” Women of the Working Class.
            The readings by Barbara Ehrenreich and Dierdre English, address how upper-middle class women were treated by their doctors and husbands in comparison to their working-class counterparts based on their gender and social class. Any ailment or disorder found in affluent women at the time were traced back their sexual organs or to “the inherent defectiveness of female physiology”. In the first clip, a male gynecologist is examining Vivian. This takes place some time after her miscarriage and the doctor is offering a new hormone that will make her body able to conceive again. Vivian is skeptical and when she asks for the side effects, the doctor tries to sell her on it by using female age stereotypes and describing how taking this drug will “make you feel 10 years younger”. In the clip, I see the gynecologist as a salesman almost and treating his practice like a business trying to sell his “customers” on ways to keep them coming back for more visits. In the reading, the same method was used when treating upper-middle class women. They would be required treatment that would last a very long time and unless it was “corrected” by a drastic surgery, it kept the necessity for frequent medical attention. Upper middle-class women had “the domineering and indulgent physician”, while the working-class women had the Public Health Officer. Working class women were often grouped together with prostitutes and were all considered sickening. At the time, the spread disease was thought to be stemming from the working class.
            Whatever social class women were in, their bodies were under the authority of men. In the second clip, Vivian’s maid, Moira, explains how not much has changed in the way men use their authority over women. In the “Sick” reading, the treatment used by doctors, instilled a “morbid cult of hypochondria” that really made women believe that they were weak also made them more dependent on their husbands, not only financially, but to help them seek treatment. In this clip, Vivian is feeling defeated and feels like she is in fact going “crazy”.

Discussion Questions
1)       In the first clip, the gynecologist says to Vivian: “Your body is like a house. You can fix the tiles in the bathroom and kitchen, but if the foundation is decaying you’ll be wasting your time.” How does this comparison demonstrate the view medical professionals had towards the bodies of “sick” upper-class women?  And how might have a woman’s miscarriage been portrayed during the early nineteenth century?
2)       In “The “Sick” Women of the Upper Classes, Ehrenreich and English refer to the upper class women as the “ideal patient”. What factors might attribute to this classification, and what kind of patient would the working class women be identified as?
3)       Moira’s summary to “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, is described more as a liberation for the female character.  As Ehrenreich and English write, “she frees herself from her prison--- into madness”. Do you see this as a triumph for the empowerment of Gilman’s heroine, or has she been debased and dehumanized?
4)       Do you think the upper-middle class and working-class women of today are still divided in certain ways when it comes to social change?


Sunday, February 24, 2013

In Response to "Too Much Exposure"


In response to the Mutter Museum video, I believe that the museum has many displays that have significant teaching value but considering our society today I think it may have more of an entertainment value. Although you can learn a lot from the displays today there are many new technologies and experiences that out do the museum experience, and science and medical school students gain more from these experiences than utilizing the museum.  Such experiences consist of cadaver labs and other dissections of animals, models used for teachings, and many other things. With these new opportunities it is not as demanding for the students to utilize such a museum as the Mutter Museum, as they can experience such things displayed in the museum first hand. Also considering time periods today many of the diseases displayed in the Mutter Museum may not even be common anymore due to new and improved technology and medical care. I believe that the Mutter Museum appears to be used more as and entertainment factor rather than a learning experience, so if this is the case, is it right to keep displaying such graphic and personal displays in a museum open to the public for entertainment?